“The reason why the world lacks unity, and lies broken and in heaps, is, because man is disunited with himself”
Such examples are; the traditions of miracles in the
earliest antiquity of all nations; the history of Jesus Christ; the
achievements of a principle, as in religious and political revolutions,
and in the abolition of the Slave-trade; the miracles of enthusiasm,
as those reported of Swedenborg, Hohenlohe, and the Shakers; many
obscure and yet contested facts, now arranged under the name of
Animal Magnetism; prayer; eloquence; self-healing; and the wisdom
of children. These are examples of Reason's momentary grasp of the
sceptre; the exertions of a power which exists not in time or space,
but an instantaneous in-streaming causing power. The difference
between the actual and the ideal force of man is happily figured by
the schoolmen, in saying, that the knowledge of man is an evening
knowledge, _vespertina cognitio_, but that of God is a morning
knowledge, _matutina cognitio_.
The problem of restoring to the world original and eternal beauty, is
solved by the redemption of the soul. The ruin or the blank, that we
see when we look at nature, is in our own eye. The axis of vision is
not coincident with the axis of things, and so they appear not
transparent but opake. The reason why the world lacks unity, and
lies broken and in heaps, is, because man is disunited with himself.
He cannot be a naturalist, until he satisfies all the demands of the
spirit. Love is as much its demand, as perception. Indeed, neither
can be perfect without the other. In the uttermost meaning of the
words, thought is devout, and devotion is thought. Deep calls unto
deep. But in actual life, the marriage is not celebrated. There are
innocent men who worship God after the tradition of their fathers,
but their sense of duty has not yet extended to the use of all their
faculties. And there are patient naturalists, but they freeze their
subject under the wintry light of the understanding. Is not prayer
also a study of truth,--a sally of the soul into the unfound infinite?
No man ever prayed heartily, without learning something. But when
a faithful thinker, resolute to detach every object from personal
relations, and see it in the light of thought, shall, at the same time,
kindle science with the fire of the holiest affections, then will God
go forth anew into the creation.
“Not in his goals but in his transitions is man great”
But wit sees the short way, puts together
what belongs together, custom or no custom; in that is organization.
Inspiration is the continuation of the divine effort that built the
man. The same course continues itself in the mind which we have
witnessed in nature, namely, the carrying-on and completion of the
metamorphosis from grub to worm, from worm to fly. In human thought
this process is often arrested for years and ages. The history of
mankind is the history of arrested growth. This premature stop, I
know not how, befalls most of us in early youth; as if the growth of
high powers, the access to rare truths, closed at two or three years
in the child, while all the pagan faculties went ripening on to sixty.
So long as you are capable of advance, so long you have not abdicated
the hope and future of a divine soul. That wonderful oracle will
reply when it is consulted, and there is no history or tradition, no
rule of life or art or science, on which it is not a competent and
the only competent judge.
Man was made for conflict, not for rest. In action is his power;
not in his goals but in his transitions man is great. Instantly he
is dwarfed by self-indulgence. The truest state of mind rested in
becomes false.
The spiritual power of man is twofold, mind and heart, Intellect and
morals; one respecting truth, the other the will. One is the man,
the other the woman in spiritual nature. One is power, the other is
love. These elements always coexist in every normal individual, but
one predominates. And as each is easily exalted in our thoughts till
it serves to fill the universe and become the synonym of God, the
soul in which one predominates is ever watchful and jealous when such
immense claims are made for one as seem injurious to the other. Ideal
and practical, like ecliptic and equator, are never parallel. Each
has its vices, its proper dangers, obvious enough when the opposite
element is deficient.
Intellect is skeptical, runs down into talent, selfish working for
private ends, conceited, ostentatious and malignant. On the other
side the clear-headed thinker complains of souls led hither and
thither by affections which, alone, are blind guides and thriftless
workmen, and in the confusion asks the polarity of intellect.
“Each man has his own vocation; his talent is his call. There is one direction in which all space is open to him.”
If we will
not be mar-plots with our miserable interferences, the work, the
society, letters, arts, science, religion of men would go on far better
than now, and the heaven predicted from the beginning of the world, and
still predicted from the bottom of the heart, would organize itself, as
do now the rose and the air and the sun.
I say, _do not choose;_ but that is a figure of speech by which I would
distinguish what is commonly called _choice_ among men, and which is a
partial act, the choice of the hands, of the eyes, of the appetites,
and not a whole act of the man. But that which I call right or
goodness, is the choice of my constitution; and that which I call
heaven, and inwardly aspire after, is the state or circumstance
desirable to my constitution; and the action which I in all my years
tend to do, is the work for my faculties. We must hold a man amenable
to reason for the choice of his daily craft or profession. It is not an
excuse any longer for his deeds that they are the custom of his trade.
What business has he with an evil trade? Has he not a _calling_ in his
character?
Each man has his own vocation. The talent is the call. There is one
direction in which all space is open to him. He has faculties silently
inviting him thither to endless exertion. He is like a ship in a river;
he runs against obstructions on every side but one, on that side all
obstruction is taken away and he sweeps serenely over a deepening
channel into an infinite sea. This talent and this call depend on his
organization, or the mode in which the general soul incarnates itself
in him. He inclines to do something which is easy to him and good when
it is done, but which no other man can do. He has no rival. For the
more truly he consults his own powers, the more difference will his
work exhibit from the work of any other. His ambition is exactly
proportioned to his powers. The height of the pinnacle is determined by
the breadth of the base. Every man has this call of the power to do
somewhat unique, and no man has any other call. The pretence that he
has another call, a summons by name and personal election and outward
“signs that mark him extraordinary, and not in the roll of common men,”
is fanaticism, and betrays obtuseness to perceive that there is one
mind in all the individuals, and no respect of persons therein.
“Traveling is a fools paradise. Our first journeys discover to us the indifference of places.”
They who made England, Italy, or Greece venerable
in the imagination did so by sticking fast where they were, like an
axis of the earth. In manly hours we feel that duty is our place. The
soul is no traveller; the wise man stays at home, and when his
necessities, his duties, on any occasion call him from his house, or
into foreign lands, he is at home still and shall make men sensible by
the expression of his countenance that he goes, the missionary of
wisdom and virtue, and visits cities and men like a sovereign and not
like an interloper or a valet.
I have no churlish objection to the circumnavigation of the globe for
the purposes of art, of study, and benevolence, so that the man is
first domesticated, or does not go abroad with the hope of finding
somewhat greater than he knows. He who travels to be amused, or to get
somewhat which he does not carry, travels away from himself, and grows
old even in youth among old things. In Thebes, in Palmyra, his will and
mind have become old and dilapidated as they. He carries ruins to
ruins.
Travelling is a fool’s paradise. Our first journeys discover to us the
indifference of places. At home I dream that at Naples, at Rome, I can
be intoxicated with beauty and lose my sadness. I pack my trunk,
embrace my friends, embark on the sea and at last wake up in Naples,
and there beside me is the stern fact, the sad self, unrelenting,
identical, that I fled from. I seek the Vatican and the palaces. I
affect to be intoxicated with sights and suggestions, but I am not
intoxicated. My giant goes with me wherever I go.
3. But the rage of travelling is a symptom of a deeper unsoundness
affecting the whole intellectual action. The intellect is vagabond, and
our system of education fosters restlessness. Our minds travel when our
bodies are forced to stay at home. We imitate; and what is imitation
but the travelling of the mind? Our houses are built with foreign
taste; our shelves are garnished with foreign ornaments; our opinions,
our tastes, our faculties, lean, and follow the Past and the Distant.
The soul created the arts wherever they have flourished. It was in his
own mind that the artist sought his model.
“A man is relieved and gay when he has put his heart into his work and done his best”
There is a time in every man’s education when he arrives at the
conviction that envy is ignorance; that imitation is suicide; that he
must take himself for better for worse as his portion; that though the
wide universe is full of good, no kernel of nourishing corn can come to
him but through his toil bestowed on that plot of ground which is given
to him to till. The power which resides in him is new in nature, and
none but he knows what that is which he can do, nor does he know until
he has tried. Not for nothing one face, one character, one fact, makes
much impression on him, and another none. This sculpture in the memory
is not without preestablished harmony. The eye was placed where one ray
should fall, that it might testify of that particular ray. We but half
express ourselves, and are ashamed of that divine idea which each of us
represents. It may be safely trusted as proportionate and of good
issues, so it be faithfully imparted, but God will not have his work
made manifest by cowards. A man is relieved and gay when he has put his
heart into his work and done his best; but what he has said or done
otherwise shall give him no peace. It is a deliverance which does not
deliver. In the attempt his genius deserts him; no muse befriends; no
invention, no hope.
Trust thyself: every heart vibrates to that iron string. Accept the
place the divine providence has found for you, the society of your
contemporaries, the connection of events. Great men have always done
so, and confided themselves childlike to the genius of their age,
betraying their perception that the absolutely trustworthy was seated
at their heart, working through their hands, predominating in all their
being. And we are now men, and must accept in the highest mind the same
transcendent destiny; and not minors and invalids in a protected
corner, not cowards fleeing before a revolution, but guides, redeemers
and benefactors, obeying the Almighty effort and advancing on Chaos and
the Dark.
What pretty oracles nature yields us on this text in the face and
behavior of children, babes, and even brutes!
“By persisting in your path, though you forfeit the little, you gain the great.”
In the last analysis, love is only the reflection of a man’s own
worthiness from other men. Men have sometimes exchanged names with
their friends, as if they would signify that in their friend each loved
his own soul.
The higher the style we demand of friendship, of course the less easy
to establish it with flesh and blood. We walk alone in the world.
Friends such as we desire are dreams and fables. But a sublime hope
cheers ever the faithful heart, that elsewhere, in other regions of the
universal power, souls are now acting, enduring, and daring, which can
love us and which we can love. We may congratulate ourselves that the
period of nonage, of follies, of blunders and of shame, is passed in
solitude, and when we are finished men we shall grasp heroic hands in
heroic hands. Only be admonished by what you already see, not to strike
leagues of friendship with cheap persons, where no friendship can be.
Our impatience betrays us into rash and foolish alliances which no god
attends. By persisting in your path, though you forfeit the little you
gain the great. You demonstrate yourself, so as to put yourself out of
the reach of false relations, and you draw to you the first-born of the
world,—those rare pilgrims whereof only one or two wander in nature at
once, and before whom the vulgar great show as spectres and shadows
merely.
It is foolish to be afraid of making our ties too spiritual, as if so
we could lose any genuine love. Whatever correction of our popular
views we make from insight, nature will be sure to bear us out in, and
though it seem to rob us of some joy, will repay us with a greater. Let
us feel if we will the absolute insulation of man. We are sure that we
have all in us. We go to Europe, or we pursue persons, or we read
books, in the instinctive faith that these will call it out and reveal
us to ourselves. Beggars all. The persons are such as we; the Europe,
an old faded garment of dead persons; the books, their ghosts. Let us
drop this idolatry. Let us give over this mendicancy. Let us even bid
our dearest friends farewell, and defy them, saying, ‘Who are you?
“Nothing astonishes men so much as common sense and plain dealing.”
When I came at
last to Rome and saw with eyes the pictures, I found that genius left
to novices the gay and fantastic and ostentatious, and itself pierced
directly to the simple and true; that it was familiar and sincere; that
it was the old, eternal fact I had met already in so many forms,—unto
which I lived; that it was the plain _you and me_ I knew so well,—had
left at home in so many conversations. I had the same experience
already in a church at Naples. There I saw that nothing was changed
with me but the place, and said to myself—‘Thou foolish child, hast
thou come out hither, over four thousand miles of salt water, to find
that which was perfect to thee there at home?’ That fact I saw again in
the Academmia at Naples, in the chambers of sculpture, and yet again
when I came to Rome and to the paintings of Raphael, Angelo, Sacchi,
Titian, and Leonardo da Vinci. “What, old mole! workest thou in the
earth so fast?” It had travelled by my side; that which I fancied I had
left in Boston was here in the Vatican, and again at Milan and at
Paris, and made all travelling ridiculous as a treadmill. I now require
this of all pictures, that they domesticate me, not that they dazzle
me. Pictures must not be too picturesque. Nothing astonishes men so
much as common-sense and plain dealing. All great actions have been
simple, and all great pictures are.
The Transfiguration, by Raphael, is an eminent example of this peculiar
merit. A calm benignant beauty shines over all this picture, and goes
directly to the heart. It seems almost to call you by name. The sweet
and sublime face of Jesus is beyond praise, yet how it disappoints all
florid expectations! This familiar, simple, home-speaking countenance
is as if one should meet a friend. The knowledge of picture-dealers has
its value, but listen not to their criticism when your heart is touched
by genius. It was not painted for them, it was painted for you; for
such as had eyes capable of being touched by simplicity and lofty
emotions.
Yet when we have said all our fine things about the arts, we must end
with a frank confession, that the arts, as we know them, are but
initial. Our best praise is given to what they aimed and promised, not
to the actual result. He has conceived meanly of the resources of man,
who believes that the best age of production is past.
“Self-sacrifice is the real miracle out of which all the reported miracles grow”
When we look for the highest benefits
of conversation, the Spartan rule of one to one is usually enforced.
Discourse, when it rises highest and searches deepest, when it lifts us
into that mood out of which thoughts come that remain as stars in our
firmament, is between two.
COURAGE.
COURAGE.
I observe that there are three qualities which conspicuously attract
the wonder and reverence of mankind:--
1. Disinterestedness, as shown in indifference to the ordinary bribes
and influences of conduct,--a purpose so sincere and generous that it
cannot be tempted aside by any prospects of wealth or other private
advantage. Self-love is, in almost all men, such an overweight, that
they are incredulous of a man’s habitual preference of the general good
to his own; but when they see it proved by sacrifices of ease, wealth,
rank, and of life itself, there is no limit to their admiration. This
has made the power of the saints of the East and West, who have led
the religion of great nations. Self-sacrifice is the real miracle out
of which all the reported miracles grew. This makes the renown of the
heroes of Greece and Rome,--of Socrates, Aristides, and Phocion; of
Quintus Curtius, Cato, and Regulus; of Hatem Tai’s hospitality; of
Chatham, whose scornful magnanimity gave him immense popularity; of
Washington, giving his service to the public without salary or reward.
2. Practical power. Men admire the man who can organize their wishes
and thoughts in stone and wood and steel and brass,--the man who can
build the boat, who has the impiety to make the rivers run the way
he wants them, who can lead his telegraph through the ocean from
shore to shore; who, sitting in his closet, can lay out the plans of
a campaign,--sea-war and land-war; such that the best generals and
admirals, when all is done, see that they must thank him for success;
the power of better combination and foresight, however exhibited,
which, whether it only plays a game of chess, or whether, more loftily,
a cunning mathematician, penetrating the cubic weights of stars,
predicts the planet which eyes had never seen; or whether, exploring
the chemical elements whereof we and the world are made, and seeing
their secret, Franklin draws off the lightning in his hand, suggesting
that one day a wiser geology shall make the earthquake harmless and
the volcano an agricultural resource.
“Nature and Books belong to the eyes that see them.”
Nothing is left us now but death. We look to that with a
grim satisfaction, saying There at least is reality that will not dodge
us.
I take this evanescence and lubricity of all objects, which lets them
slip through our fingers then when we clutch hardest, to be the most
unhandsome part of our condition. Nature does not like to be observed,
and likes that we should be her fools and playmates. We may have the
sphere for our cricket-ball, but not a berry for our philosophy. Direct
strokes she never gave us power to make; all our blows glance, all our
hits are accidents. Our relations to each other are oblique and casual.
Dream delivers us to dream, and there is no end to illusion. Life is a
train of moods like a string of beads, and as we pass through them they
prove to be many-colored lenses which paint the world their own hue, and
each shows only what lies in its focus. From the mountain you see the
mountain. We animate what we can, and we see only what we animate.
Nature and books belong to the eyes that see them. It depends on the
mood of the man whether he shall see the sunset or the fine poem. There
are always sunsets, and there is always genius; but only a few hours so
serene that we can relish nature or criticism. The more or less depends
on structure or temperament. Temperament is the iron wire on which
the beads are strung. Of what use is fortune or talent to a cold and
defective nature? Who cares what sensibility or discrimination a man has
at some time shown, if he falls asleep in his chair? or if he laugh and
giggle? or if he apologize? or is infected with egotism? or thinks of
his dollar? or cannot go by food? or has gotten a child in his boyhood?
Of what use is genius, if the organ is too convex or too concave and
cannot find a focal distance within the actual horizon of human life? Of
what use, if the brain is too cold or too hot, and the man does not care
enough for results to stimulate him to experiment, and hold him up in
it? or if the web is too finely woven, too irritable by pleasure and
pain, so that life stagnates from too much reception without due
outlet?
“A strenuous soul hates cheap success.”
Here you are set down, scholars and idealists, as in a
barbarous age; amidst insanity, to calm and guide it; amidst fools and
blind, to see the right done; among violent proprietors, to check
self-interest, stone-blind and stone-deaf, by considerations of humanity
to the workman and to his child; amongst angry politicians swelling with
self-esteem, pledged to parties, pledged to clients, you are to make
valid the large considerations of equity and good sense; under bad
governments, to force on them, by your persistence, good laws. Around
that immovable persistency of yours, statesmen, legislatures, must
revolve, denying you, but not less forced to obey.
We wish to put the ideal rules into practice, to offer liberty instead
of chains, and see whether liberty will not disclose its proper checks;
believing that a free press will prove safer than the censorship; to
ordain free trade, and believe that it will not bankrupt us; universal
suffrage, believing that it will not carry us to mobs, or back to kings
again. I believe that the checks are as sure as the springs. It is
thereby that men are great, and have great allies. And who are the
allies? Rude opposition, apathy, slander,--even these. Difficulties
exist to be surmounted. The great heart will no more complain of the
obstructions that make success hard, than of the iron walls of the gun
which hinder the shot from scattering. It was walled round with iron
tube with that purpose, to give it irresistible force in one direction.
A strenuous soul hates cheap successes. It is the ardor of the assailant
that makes the vigor of the defender. The great are not tender at being
obscure, despised, insulted. Such only feel themselves in adverse
fortune. Strong men greet war, tempest, hard times, which search till
they find resistance and bottom. They wish, as Pindar said, "to tread
the floors of hell, with necessities as hard as iron." Periodicity,
reaction, are laws of mind as well as of matter. Bad kings and governors
help us, if only they are bad enough. In England, it was the game laws
which exasperated the farmers to carry the Reform Bill. It was what we
call _plantation manners_ which drove peaceable, forgiving New England
to emancipation without phrase. In the Rebellion, who were our best
allies? Always the enemy. The community of scholars do not know their
own power, and dishearten each other by tolerating political baseness in
their members. Now, nobody doubts the power of manners, or that wherever
high society exists, it is very well able to exclude pretenders.
“Difficulties exist to be surmounted”
Here you are set down, scholars and idealists, as in a
barbarous age; amidst insanity, to calm and guide it; amidst fools and
blind, to see the right done; among violent proprietors, to check
self-interest, stone-blind and stone-deaf, by considerations of humanity
to the workman and to his child; amongst angry politicians swelling with
self-esteem, pledged to parties, pledged to clients, you are to make
valid the large considerations of equity and good sense; under bad
governments, to force on them, by your persistence, good laws. Around
that immovable persistency of yours, statesmen, legislatures, must
revolve, denying you, but not less forced to obey.
We wish to put the ideal rules into practice, to offer liberty instead
of chains, and see whether liberty will not disclose its proper checks;
believing that a free press will prove safer than the censorship; to
ordain free trade, and believe that it will not bankrupt us; universal
suffrage, believing that it will not carry us to mobs, or back to kings
again. I believe that the checks are as sure as the springs. It is
thereby that men are great, and have great allies. And who are the
allies? Rude opposition, apathy, slander,--even these. Difficulties
exist to be surmounted. The great heart will no more complain of the
obstructions that make success hard, than of the iron walls of the gun
which hinder the shot from scattering. It was walled round with iron
tube with that purpose, to give it irresistible force in one direction.
A strenuous soul hates cheap successes. It is the ardor of the assailant
that makes the vigor of the defender. The great are not tender at being
obscure, despised, insulted. Such only feel themselves in adverse
fortune. Strong men greet war, tempest, hard times, which search till
they find resistance and bottom. They wish, as Pindar said, "to tread
the floors of hell, with necessities as hard as iron." Periodicity,
reaction, are laws of mind as well as of matter. Bad kings and governors
help us, if only they are bad enough. In England, it was the game laws
which exasperated the farmers to carry the Reform Bill. It was what we
call _plantation manners_ which drove peaceable, forgiving New England
to emancipation without phrase.
“The reason why all men honor love is because it looks up, and not down; aspires and not despairs”
self-possessed or prudent, it is all abandonment. Is it not a
certain admirable wisdom, preferable to all other advantages, and
whereof all others are only secondaries and indemnities, because this is
that in which the individual is no longer his own foolish master, but
inhales an odorous and celestial air, is wrapped round with awe of the
object, blending for the time that object with the real and only good,
and consults every omen in nature with tremulous interest. When we speak
truly,--is not he only unhappy who is not in love? his fancied freedom
and self-rule--is it not so much death? He who is in love is wise and is
becoming wiser, sees newly every time he looks at the object beloved,
drawing from it with his eyes and his mind those virtues which it
possesses. Therefore if the object be not itself a living and expanding
soul, he presently exhausts it. But the love remains in his mind, and
the wisdom it brought him; and it craves a new and higher object. And
the reason why all men honor love, is because it looks up and not down;
aspires and not despairs.
And what is Genius but finer love, a love impersonal, a love of the
flower and perfection of things, and a desire to draw a new picture or
copy of the same? It looks to the cause and life: it proceeds from
within outward, whilst Talent goes from without inward. Talent finds its
models, methods, and ends, in society, exists for exhibition, and goes
to the soul only for power to work. Genius is its own end, and draws its
means and the style of its architecture from within, going abroad only
for audience, and spectator, as we adapt our voice and phrase to the
distance and character of the ear we speak to. All your learning of all
literatures would never enable you to anticipate one of its thoughts or
expressions, and yet each is natural and familiar as household words.
Here about us coils forever the ancient enigma, so old and so
unutterable. Behold! there is the sun, and the rain, and the rocks: the
old sun, the old stones. How easy were it to describe all this fitly;
yet no word can pass.
“This time,like all times, is a good time, if we but know what to do with it.”
it seems, are critical; we are embarrassed with second thoughts; we
cannot enjoy any thing for hankering to know whereof the pleasure
consists; we are lined with eyes; we see with our feet; the time is
infected with Hamlet’s unhappiness,--
“Sicklied o’er with the pale cast of thought.”
It is so bad then? Sight is the last thing to be pitied. Would we be
blind? Do we fear lest we should outsee nature and God, and drink truth
dry? I look upon the discontent of the literary class, as a mere
announcement of the fact, that they find themselves not in the state of
mind of their fathers, and regret the coming state as untried; as a boy
dreads the water before he has learned that he can swim. If there is any
period one would desire to be born in,--is it not the age of Revolution;
when the old and the new stand side by side, and admit of being
compared; when the energies of all men are searched by fear and by hope;
when the historic glories of the old, can be compensated by the rich
possibilities of the new era? This time, like all times, is a very good
one, if we but know what to do with it.
I read with some joy of the auspicious signs of the coming days, as they
glimmer already through poetry and art, through philosophy and science,
through church and state.
One of these signs is the fact, that the same movement which effected
the elevation of what was called the lowest class in the state, assumed
in literature a very marked and as benign an aspect. Instead of the
sublime and beautiful; the near, the low, the common, was explored and
poetized. That, which had been negligently trodden under foot by those
who were harnessing and provisioning themselves for long journeys into
far countries, is suddenly found to be richer than all foreign parts.
The literature of the poor, the feelings of the child, the philosophy of
the street, the meaning of household life, are the topics of the time.
It is a great stride. It is a sign,--is it not? of new vigor, when the
extremities are made active, when currents of warm life run into the
hands and the feet. I ask not for the great, the remote, the romantic;
what is doing in Italy or Arabia; what is Greek art, or Provençal
minstrelsy; I embrace the common, I explore and sit at the feet of the
familiar, the low.
“Hence arose the saying, If I love you, what is that to you? We say so, because we feel that what we love is not in your will, but above it. It is not you, but your radiance. It is that which you know not in yourself, and can never know.”
The statue is then
beautiful when it begins to be incomprehensible, when it is passing out
of criticism and can no longer be defined by compass and
measuring-wand, but demands an active imagination to go with it and to
say what it is in the act of doing. The god or hero of the sculptor is
always represented in a transition _from_ that which is representable
to the senses, _to_ that which is not. Then first it ceases to be a
stone. The same remark holds of painting. And of poetry the success is
not attained when it lulls and satisfies, but when it astonishes and
fires us with new endeavors after the unattainable. Concerning it
Landor inquires “whether it is not to be referred to some purer state
of sensation and existence.”
In like manner, personal beauty is then first charming and itself when
it dissatisfies us with any end; when it becomes a story without an
end; when it suggests gleams and visions and not earthly satisfactions;
when it makes the beholder feel his unworthiness; when he cannot feel
his right to it, though he were Cæsar; he cannot feel more right to it
than to the firmament and the splendors of a sunset.
Hence arose the saying, “If I love you, what is that to you?” We say so
because we feel that what we love is not in your will, but above it. It
is not you, but your radiance. It is that which you know not in
yourself and can never know.
This agrees well with that high philosophy of Beauty which the ancient
writers delighted in; for they said that the soul of man, embodied here
on earth, went roaming up and down in quest of that other world of its
own out of which it came into this, but was soon stupefied by the light
of the natural sun, and unable to see any other objects than those of
this world, which are but shadows of real things. Therefore the Deity
sends the glory of youth before the soul, that it may avail itself of
beautiful bodies as aids to its recollection of the celestial good and
fair; and the man beholding such a person in the female sex runs to her
and finds the highest joy in contemplating the form, movement, and
intelligence of this person, because it suggests to him the presence of
that which indeed is within the beauty, and the cause of the beauty.
If however, from too much conversing with material objects, the soul
was gross, and misplaced its satisfaction in the body, it reaped
nothing but sorrow; body being unable to fulfil the promise which
beauty holds out; but if, accepting the hint of these visions and
suggestions which beauty makes to his mind, the soul passes through the
body and falls to admire strokes of character, and the lovers
contemplate one another in their discourses and their actions, then
they pass to the true palace of beauty, more and more inflame their
love of it, and by this love extinguishing the base affection, as the
sun puts out the fire by shining on the hearth, they become pure and
hallowed.
“...truth is handsomer than the affectation of love. Your goodness must have some edge to it, --else it is none.”
Good and bad are but names very readily
transferable to that or this; the only right is what is after my
constitution; the only wrong what is against it. A man is to carry
himself in the presence of all opposition as if every thing were
titular and ephemeral but he. I am ashamed to think how easily we
capitulate to badges and names, to large societies and dead
institutions. Every decent and well-spoken individual affects and sways
me more than is right. I ought to go upright and vital, and speak the
rude truth in all ways. If malice and vanity wear the coat of
philanthropy, shall that pass? If an angry bigot assumes this bountiful
cause of Abolition, and comes to me with his last news from Barbadoes,
why should I not say to him, ‘Go love thy infant; love thy
wood-chopper; be good-natured and modest; have that grace; and never
varnish your hard, uncharitable ambition with this incredible
tenderness for black folk a thousand miles off. Thy love afar is spite
at home.’ Rough and graceless would be such greeting, but truth is
handsomer than the affectation of love. Your goodness must have some
edge to it,—else it is none. The doctrine of hatred must be preached,
as the counteraction of the doctrine of love, when that pules and
whines. I shun father and mother and wife and brother when my genius
calls me. I would write on the lintels of the door-post, _Whim_. I hope
it is somewhat better than whim at last, but we cannot spend the day in
explanation. Expect me not to show cause why I seek or why I exclude
company. Then again, do not tell me, as a good man did to-day, of my
obligation to put all poor men in good situations. Are they _my_ poor?
I tell thee thou foolish philanthropist that I grudge the dollar, the
dime, the cent, I give to such men as do not belong to me and to whom I
do not belong. There is a class of persons to whom by all spiritual
affinity I am bought and sold; for them I will go to prison if need be;
but your miscellaneous popular charities; the education at college of
fools; the building of meeting-houses to the vain end to which many now
stand; alms to sots, and the thousand-fold Relief Societies;—though I
confess with shame I sometimes succumb and give the dollar, it is a
wicked dollar which by and by I shall have the manhood to withhold.
“With consistency a great soul has simply nothing to do. He may as well concern himself with his shadow on the wall.”
The other terror that scares us from self-trust is our consistency; a
reverence for our past act or word because the eyes of others have no
other data for computing our orbit than our past acts, and we are loath
to disappoint them.
But why should you keep your head over your shoulder? Why drag about
this corpse of your memory, lest you contradict somewhat you have
stated in this or that public place? Suppose you should contradict
yourself; what then? It seems to be a rule of wisdom never to rely on
your memory alone, scarcely even in acts of pure memory, but to bring
the past for judgment into the thousand-eyed present, and live ever in
a new day. In your metaphysics you have denied personality to the
Deity, yet when the devout motions of the soul come, yield to them
heart and life, though they should clothe God with shape and color.
Leave your theory, as Joseph his coat in the hand of the harlot, and
flee.
A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by
little statesmen and philosophers and divines. With consistency a great
soul has simply nothing to do. He may as well concern himself with his
shadow on the wall. Speak what you think now in hard words and
to-morrow speak what to-morrow thinks in hard words again, though it
contradict every thing you said to-day.—‘Ah, so you shall be sure to be
misunderstood.’—Is it so bad then to be misunderstood? Pythagoras was
misunderstood, and Socrates, and Jesus, and Luther, and Copernicus, and
Galileo, and Newton, and every pure and wise spirit that ever took
flesh. To be great is to be misunderstood.
I suppose no man can violate his nature. All the sallies of his will
are rounded in by the law of his being, as the inequalities of Andes
and Himmaleh are insignificant in the curve of the sphere. Nor does it
matter how you gauge and try him. A character is like an acrostic or
Alexandrian stanza;—read it forward, backward, or across, it still
spells the same thing. In this pleasing contrite wood-life which God
allows me, let me record day by day my honest thought without prospect
or retrospect, and, I cannot doubt, it will be found symmetrical,
though I mean it not and see it not.
“Thou art to me a delicious torment.”
The law of nature is
alternation for evermore. Each electrical state superinduces the
opposite. The soul environs itself with friends that it may enter into
a grander self-acquaintance or solitude; and it goes alone for a
season, that it may exalt its conversation or society. This method
betrays itself along the whole history of our personal relations. The
instinct of affection revives the hope of union with our mates, and the
returning sense of insulation recalls us from the chase. Thus every man
passes his life in the search after friendship, and if he should record
his true sentiment, he might write a letter like this to each new
candidate for his love:—
DEAR FRIEND,
If I was sure of thee, sure of thy capacity, sure to match my mood with
thine, I should never think again of trifles in relation to thy comings
and goings. I am not very wise; my moods are quite attainable, and I
respect thy genius; it is to me as yet unfathomed; yet dare I not
presume in thee a perfect intelligence of me, and so thou art to me a
delicious torment. Thine ever, or never.
Yet these uneasy pleasures and fine pains are for curiosity and not for
life. They are not to be indulged. This is to weave cobweb, and not
cloth. Our friendships hurry to short and poor conclusions, because we
have made them a texture of wine and dreams, instead of the tough fibre
of the human heart. The laws of friendship are austere and eternal, of
one web with the laws of nature and of morals. But we have aimed at a
swift and petty benefit, to suck a sudden sweetness. We snatch at the
slowest fruit in the whole garden of God, which many summers and many
winters must ripen. We seek our friend not sacredly, but with an
adulterate passion which would appropriate him to ourselves. In vain.
We are armed all over with subtle antagonisms, which, as soon as we
meet, begin to play, and translate all poetry into stale prose. Almost
all people descend to meet. All association must be a compromise, and,
what is worst, the very flower and aroma of the flower of each of the
beautiful natures disappears as they approach each other.
“This time, like all times, is a very good one, if we but know what to do with it.”
We are embarrassed with second
thoughts.[78] We cannot enjoy anything for hankering to know whereof
the pleasure consists. We are lined with eyes. We see with our feet.
The time is infected with Hamlet's unhappiness,--
"Sicklied o'er with the pale cast of thought."[79]
Is it so bad then? Sight is the last thing to be pitied. Would we be
blind? Do we fear lest we should outsee nature and God, and drink
truth dry? I look upon the discontent of the literary class as a mere
announcement of the fact that they find themselves not in the state of
mind of their fathers, and regret the coming state as untried; as a
boy dreads the water before he has learned that he can swim. If there
is any period one would desire to be born in, is it not the age of
Revolution; when the old and the new stand side by side and admit of
being compared; when the energies of all men are searched by fear and
by hope; when the historic glories of the old can be compensated by
the rich possibilities of the new era? This time, like all times, is a
very good one, if we but know what to do with it.
I read with some joy of the auspicious signs of the coming days, as
they glimmer already through poetry and art, through philosophy and
science, through church and state.
One of these signs is the fact that the same movement[80] which
effected the elevation of what was called the lowest class in the
state assumed in literature a very marked and as benign an aspect.
Instead of the sublime and beautiful, the near, the low, the common,
was explored and poetized. That which had been negligently trodden
under foot by those who were harnessing and provisioning themselves
for long journeys into far countries, is suddenly found to be richer
than all foreign parts. The literature of the poor, the feelings of
the child, the philosophy of the street, the meaning of household
life, are the topics of the time. It is a great stride. It is a
sign--is it not?--of new vigor when the extremities are made active,
when currents of warm life run into the hands and the feet. I ask not
for the great, the remote, the romantic; what is doing in Italy or
Arabia; what is Greek art, or Provençal minstrelsy; I embrace the
common, I explore and sit at the feet of the familiar, the low.
Love, and you shall be loved.
I
cannot doubt that the high laws which each man sees implicated in those
processes with which he is conversant, the stern ethics which sparkle
on his chisel-edge, which are measured out by his plumb and foot-rule,
which stand as manifest in the footing of the shop-bill as in the
history of a state,—do recommend to him his trade, and though seldom
named, exalt his business to his imagination.
The league between virtue and nature engages all things to assume a
hostile front to vice. The beautiful laws and substances of the world
persecute and whip the traitor. He finds that things are arranged for
truth and benefit, but there is no den in the wide world to hide a
rogue. Commit a crime, and the earth is made of glass. Commit a crime,
and it seems as if a coat of snow fell on the ground, such as reveals
in the woods the track of every partridge and fox and squirrel and
mole. You cannot recall the spoken word, you cannot wipe out the
foot-track, you cannot draw up the ladder, so as to leave no inlet or
clew. Some damning circumstance always transpires. The laws and
substances of nature,—water, snow, wind, gravitation,—become penalties
to the thief.
On the other hand the law holds with equal sureness for all right
action. Love, and you shall be loved. All love is mathematically just,
as much as the two sides of an algebraic equation. The good man has
absolute good, which like fire turns every thing to its own nature, so
that you cannot do him any harm; but as the royal armies sent against
Napoleon, when he approached cast down their colors and from enemies
became friends, so disasters of all kinds, as sickness, offence,
poverty, prove benefactors:—
“Winds blow and waters roll
Strength to the brave, and power and deity,
Yet in themselves are nothing.”
The good are befriended even by weakness and defect. As no man had ever
a point of pride that was not injurious to him, so no man had ever a
defect that was not somewhere made useful to him. The stag in the fable
admired his horns and blamed his feet, but when the hunter came, his
feet saved him, and afterwards, caught in the thicket, his horns
destroyed him. Every man in his lifetime needs to thank his faults. As
no man thoroughly understands a truth until he has contended against
it, so no man has a thorough acquaintance with the hindrances or
talents of men until he has suffered from the one and seen the triumph
of the other over his own want of the same.
He who is in love is wise and is becoming wiser, sees newly every time he looks at the object beloved, drawing from it with his eyes and his mind those virtues which it possesses.
But there are other examples of this total and supreme influence,
besides Nature and the conscience. “From the poisonous tree, the
world,” say the Brahmins, “two species of fruit are produced, sweet as
the waters of life, Love or the society of beautiful souls, and Poetry,
whose taste is like the immortal juice of Vishnu.” What is Love, and why
is it the chief good, but because it is an overpowering enthusiasm?
Never self-possessed or prudent, it is all abandonment. Is it not a
certain admirable wisdom, preferable to all other advantages, and
whereof all others are only secondaries and indemnities, because this is
that in which the individual is no longer his own foolish master, but
inhales an odorous and celestial air, is wrapped round with awe of the
object, blending for the time that object with the real and only good,
and consults every omen in nature with tremulous interest. When we speak
truly,--is not he only unhappy who is not in love? his fancied freedom
and self-rule--is it not so much death? He who is in love is wise and is
becoming wiser, sees newly every time he looks at the object beloved,
drawing from it with his eyes and his mind those virtues which it
possesses. Therefore if the object be not itself a living and expanding
soul, he presently exhausts it. But the love remains in his mind, and
the wisdom it brought him; and it craves a new and higher object. And
the reason why all men honor love, is because it looks up and not down;
aspires and not despairs.
And what is Genius but finer love, a love impersonal, a love of the
flower and perfection of things, and a desire to draw a new picture or
copy of the same? It looks to the cause and life: it proceeds from
within outward, whilst Talent goes from without inward. Talent finds its
models, methods, and ends, in society, exists for exhibition, and goes
to the soul only for power to work. Genius is its own end, and draws its
means and the style of its architecture from within, going abroad only
for audience, and spectator, as we adapt our voice and phrase to the
distance and character of the ear we speak to. All your learning of all
literatures would never enable you to anticipate one of its thoughts or
expressions, and yet each is natural and familiar as household words.